data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2373/b2373430119bb5bd0c30a0ccd33ca8a363453db6" alt=""
Whatever we may choose to call it, a vehicle is ultimately defined by what it does, and what better word than “utility” to describe a vehicle that does just about everything. And yet everything, as it applies to the Ridgeline, does have limits. For example, Honda’s unibody truck (a structu
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893b9/893b93b6d51d842107be8449a5d644ed4044d34d" alt=""
Even though all-wheel drive is standard, there’s no low-range feature for creeping in tough job-site terrain—our ’05 comparo rated the Ridgeline least comfortable with off-road duty—and, of course, no one, true trucker or poultry inspector, has ever called the Ridgeline pretty. In fact, the U-word—ugly—pops up often in our test truck’s logbook.
Just about everyone who drove the Ridgeline was pleasantly surprised by its agility, and all occupants had good things to say about its ride quality. Sometimes they even forgot to add the “for a truck” disclaimer, and one logbook scribbler thought it behaved “like a tall Accord.”
Inevitably, there were a few niggling gripes. For example, after creepi
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0cb2/f0cb2e1eb4f406e491cebb3d18ff467207488def" alt=""
And speaking of design-imposed drawbacks, the cargo-bed sides, which slope up en route to the front of the box (from 16.0 inches at the rear to 21.5 inches at the front) made it impossible to grab stuff in the bed’s center without bellying up against the outside of the truck—not a good thing if you happened to be wearing your Tom Wolfe whites. Period.
No comments:
Post a Comment